Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Sheerer: Obama by default...NO, Obama by merit in November

By Robert Scheer from truthdig.com website, April 4, 2012
The Republicans are a sick joke, and their narrow ideological stupidity has left rational voters no choice in the coming presidential election but Barack Obama. With Ron Paul out of it and warmongering hedge fund hustler Mitt Romney the likely Republican nominee, the GOP has defined itself indelibly as the party of moneyed greed and unfettered imperialism.
It is with chilling certainty that one can predict that a single Romney appointee to the Supreme Court would seal the coup of the 1 percent that already is well on its way toward purchasing the nation’s political soul. Romney is the quintessential Citizens United super PAC candidate, a man who has turned avarice into virtue and comes to us now as a once-moderate politician transformed into the ultimate prophet of imperial hubris, blaming everyone from the Chinese to laid-off American workers for our problems. Everyone, that is, except the Wall Street-dominated GOP, which midwifed the Great Recession under George W. Bush and now seeks to blame Obama for the enormous deficit spawned by the party’s wanton behavior.
Without a militarily sophisticated enemy anywhere on the planet, the United States, thanks to the Bush-bloated budget, now spends almost as much on defense as the rest of the world combined. Yet the GOP honchos dare claim they are for small government even as their chosen candidate champs at the bit to go to war with Iran.
They obviously learned nothing from the disasters of Bush the Second, who hijacked the tragedy of 9/11 to launch the most wasteful orgy of military spending in U.S. history in his failed effort to take out an al-Qaida enemy that had no significant military arsenal. That enemy was later eliminated by Obama, whom the Republicans still obstinately refuse to credit for accomplishing what Bush failed to. Can you imagine the explosion of preening self-congratulation that would have resulted if a GOP president had done the deed?
The red-ink deficits that had been stanched under Bill Clinton came to gush uncontrollably because of the swollen military budgets, compounded by the severe costs of the recession that occurred on Bush’s watch.
But the Republicans refuse to take ownership of the collapse resulting from their longstanding advocacy of radical financial deregulation that led to the derivatives bubble, hundreds of trillions of dollars of toxic junk, now a permanent, nightmarish feature of the world’s economy. Romney, who made his fortune through such financial finagling, even has the effrontery to call for more of the same and blame Obama’s tepid efforts at establishing some sane speed limits for the financial highway as a cause of our ongoing crisis.
So insanely gullible are Republican voters that they buy Mitt’s line that bailing out the auto industry to save the heart of America’s legendary industrial base was an example of big-government waste. Yet to them the almost unimaginable sum spent on the Wall Street bailout represents prudent small-government fiscal responsibility.
The incumbent president has his failings, but compared to Mitt Romney he is a paradigm of considered and compassionate thought. As Obama put it in a speech before a journalism group this week, we are saddled with a national debt “that has grown over the last decade, primarily as a result of two wars, two massive tax cuts, and an unprecedented financial crisis, [and] that will have to be paid down.” But instead of dealing with the causes of that debt, Romney has called for an increase in military spending, continued tax breaks for the rich and reversal of the very limited restraints on corporate greed that Obama managed to get through Congress. He has endorsed the House-passed Paul Ryan budget, which, as Obama noted, even Newt Gingrich once derided as “radical” and an effort at “right-wing social engineering.”
Such radicalism leaves Obama as the “moderate” choice in the coming election, defending centrist programs that Republicans in the past helped originate. Indeed, the big attack on Obama will involve what the Republicans call Obamacare—which was modeled in every important respect on Romneycare, enacted when the GOP candidate was governor of Massachusetts.
The overarching lesson of this primary season is that Romney and the Republicans he seeks to win over are incapable of embracing the very moderation that, particularly in the golden era of Dwight Eisenhower, defined the party. Instead, they are now a reckless force bent on destroying the essential social contract that has been the basis of America’s economic and social progress.
As Obama said Tuesday in addressing the editors and reporters: “... We’re going to have to answer a central question as a nation. ... Can we succeed as a country where a shrinking number of people do exceedingly well, while a growing number struggle to get by? ... This is not just another run-of-the-mill political debate. ... It’s the defining issue of our time.”
Originally entitled "Obama by default," this piece does not give enough credit to the President, for enduring the worst Congressional behaviour, by the Republicans, in their adoption of the maxim, "Obama, a one-term president". He was able to pass a moderate Health Care Reform Act, despite the challenge it is currently receiving from the Supreme Court, another Republican cadre of black robes responsible for the Citizens United decision that brought about the complete "selling" and "buying" of the Republican nomination by Romney and his millions, linked to his 15% tax rate, simply because most of his income is derived from investments linked to his off-shore accounts.
It is not only the Ryan budget proposals that could be called "social engineering," but the whole attitude of the Republican party, based on running essentially against government as the enemy, and Obama as the incarnation of that enemy that results, in too many states, in laws like the "Stand Your Ground" law, permitting shooting someone when one feels threatened. So not only are guns permitted everywhere, in the purses and in the gloveboxes, in the bedside tables and in the kitchen cupboards of the nation, but so are the shots fired whenever one feels the least intimidation.
And then there is the tax question, through which the Republicans seek to empower the super-rich, as their "base" (remember Dubya's proud joke), and hope that enough of the rest will be so gullible that they will support lower taxes for the rich, and the accompanying dismantling of the social safety net, such as it is, as the price for such foolishness.
It was CBS' 60 Minutes that pointed to the potential for a Greek, and then potentially a Spanish, Irish, Portuguese, and possible an Italian default on billions of debt this week, as a harbinger of the potential trouble, not only for Europe but also for the rest of the world, should these countries actually default on their fiscal debt. And yet the U.S. continues, led by the Republicans, to maintain a blindness to their own narcissism, that seeks to paint government everywhere as the problem, and certainly not part of the solution.
Where would Michigan be now, if not for the federal bailout of the auto-makers?
Where would millions of Americans be now, if not for the Health Care Reform Act, that bars the insurance companies from refusing covering because of existing conditions?
Where would America's global reputation be, if not for a moderate, modest and mature president guiding her through not only the worst economic crisis but also the worst political crisis of a century?
Obama should not be elected simply because the Republicans have left the sane region of the political playing field to him, but because he has provided significant responsible stability and courage amid one of the most turbulent political periods of the last century.
So, if their mantra is "Obama, a one-term president," by their very narrow-minded, and conceivably bigoted and certainly selfish perspective in favour of the well-to-do, formerly one of the signs of hope for the middle and lower classes in America, they may well have defaulted on responsible government, and given both America and the world another four years of this president.
Ironically, we could all be thanking this group of rather blind and arrogant people for such an outcome, in November.

No comments:

Post a Comment