Pettiness and anality abound
We have already, collectively, consciously and
deliberately destroyed all vestiges of shame. Are we also participating in the
full entropy of irony, context and altruism?
Of course, there will be many who argue that last
night’s HandInHand.com concert from New York, Los Angeles, Nashville and San
Antonio, carried by all three major networks demonstrates a significant
outpouring of support, care and some $14
million (at nine p.m. when the show went off the air) for those millions of
people who have been impacted by two monster storms, Harvey and Irma. There are
also many examples of not-for-profit philanthropies like Doctors Without
Borders, Engineers without Borders, Right to Play, War Children and the others
like World Vision, The Plan, Oxfam and many others that have been making
significant contributions to the plight of the dispossessed around the world
for decades. So, to be fair, altruism is not dead.
Nevertheless, there are signs that our public
discourse is not merely being stripped of decency, fairness, a full
appreciation of the context of many complex situations and issues, but also the
apparent willful denial of irony, perspective and context. Replacing the more nuanced,
complex and ironic appreciation of issues in the public forum is an
instant-gratification, pulgilistic and narcissistic critical parenting of
anyone, everyone and all of this without a whimper of remorse, apology,
reconsideration or reflection and amendment.
While working in a hovel of a mission church on the
sagebrush desert on the west side of the Continental Divide, where dry, dusty
air and stunted coniferous shrubs and blowing dried clumps of tumbleweed
symbolized the dried spirits and hopes of many, I placed a bottle of water
behind the altar for obvious reasons while conducting services. An anal and
hyper super-ego warden condemned the appearance of the bottle publicly, without
successfully achieving her motive of having it removed. Separation of church
and state, another of the many icons worshipped by the American people, had not
found a place in this Canadian consciousness, regarding that water bottle.
Neither did the separation find resonance when
conversations from the previous week were embedded in homilies, without names
or references, to the dismay of those who considered such ‘invasions’ of
privacy so abhorrent that they withdrew from the mission.
Ironically, however, the collection, recording and
boastful reporting of cash revenue was and remained one of the more obvious
secular, cultural and corporate traits that served as the identity signature of
the mission, both in the eyes of the worshippers and, tragically and more
importantly, in the eyes of the hierarchy of the diocese. Clearly, separation
of church and state did not extend to matters of financial revenue and balance
sheets. The obvious contradiction and conflict, given the more natural pursuit
of spiritual growth and development of both individuals and relationships with
others and with God, with the pursuit of corporate goals and methods
(evangelism being a surrogate for marketing and advertising) trumping the
spiritual needs of the people in the pews, seemed to be lost on many.
Recently, in Canada, there have been a couple of news
reports that demonstrate a cultural and societal blindness to irony and to
context both of which, if not merely singular and isolated instances, could and
likely will generate more of the same. The first comes from the Ontario
Judicial System and concerns a judge in Hamilton who, ironically and obviously
sardonically, wore a “make America great again” hat into court on the day
following the American presidential election in November, 2016. He is not and
was not a supporter of the victor of that election, and merely sought a little
levity. However, as a consequence of some 81 complaints against his “lack of
judgement” he has not been permitted to hear a single case since, and just
yesterday was hit with a 30-day suspension without pay for his lack of deference
to the judicial system’s “objectivity”. An Associate Professor of Law at the
University of Windsor Law School is one of the complainants, and clearly agrees
with the “punishment” given that the alternative would have been to remove the
transgressing judge from the bench.
Think for a moment about a judicial system that is
incapable of laughing at one of the most historic, tragic and laughable
election results in the history of western civilization…and a system that is
prepared to discipline one of its “institutions” for not following the rules of
“decorum” (not of judicial judgement)
without pausing to consider that there might be a difference in meaning and
significance between judicial judgement and decorum. I would be one of possible
thousands who would prefer to be a defendant before such a judge (if necessary)
as compared with another of the anal “objectivists” who cannot see the forest
for the trees. This is a very slippery slope on which the judicial system is setting
its collective foot. IT could lead to things like the removal of water bottles
from public view on judges’ desks in public courtrooms; it could also lead to a
return of wigs for all judges; it could lead to a ban on all laughter,
regardless of the source or the target of the wit inside Ontario courtrooms.
And when laughter is surgically and clinically excised from the legal process,
there is a different kind of cultural danger: that the judicial process is
blind to the human condition that underlies each and every case that comes before
the bench. If we “balkanize” the courts (to take this example) from the street
of human activity, we risk such tunnel vision that only the most narrow reading
of each case is permissible. Defendants, in such a situation, are at risk of
being convicted because relevant and circumstantial and biographical evidence
as to motive, background, mental and emotional state is relegated to the trash.
Of course, the legal purists and the anal super-egos among us will be
triumphant, in such a situation. However, too much will have been sacrificed on
a hollow principle of perfection to which no one is capable of reaching,
including the 81 complainants in this case. And of course, none of them has
ever, or will ever, make a similar mis-step in ‘decorum’ in their pursuit of
their legal careers.
Another report comes from CBC on the Canadian
government’s provision of escape flights for stranded Canadians in the wake of
tropical storm/hurricane Irma in the Caribbean. Some 900 people were evacuated
on Canadian airline and military flights, according to the government. And yet,
many of these people complained that they were not evacuated as quickly as they
deemed both necessary and competitively appropriate, as compared with evacuees
to other places. Evan Dyer, the CBC reporter who aired the report on Radio 2
yesterday, wisely and professionally, put the story into a more complete and
relevant and merited context, including the loss of power at airports, the
obstructions to flights on runways, and the relatively inappropriately
narcissistic and unappreciative responses of the Canadians who were flown back
to Toronto.
It is this blatant lack of appreciation, this wanton
disregard for extenuating circumstances, this “me-first,” and “me-only” and
“me-now” attitude that renders all others, including those who are doing
whatever they can to help, to a judgement of incompetence, insouciance,
insensitivity. In the process this attitude of selfishness and narrowness
demonstrates a level of arrogance, isolation and abhorrence from the recipients
that borders on repulsive. And of course, if and when any of those evacuees who
might read this will say that this observer is out of touch with their reality,
since I was not among them. And they will consider these comments themselves
arrogant, judgemental and irrelevant.
This space is not a predictable supporter of this
Canadian government or certainly of the previous Conservative government.
However, these reports of a lack of appreciation and of criticism of our
government go beyond what seems reasonable. Further, the former Canadian
Ambassador to Cuba has argued publicly that those citizens who were evacuated
from storm-torn islands in the sun should reimburse the federal government for
the flight home, arguing persuasively that Canadian taxpayers should not be
saddled with the cost.
Just because individual and collective perspectives
have been so changed increasingly focussing on the micro, even the nano,
aspects of every situation, (thereby elevating both the technical legal and
miniscule accounting “facts” far above the “big picture” perspective, that
continues to remain significant), does not represent a world view that is
either sustainable, ethical or moral…nor does it elucidate the “whole truth”….There
is a legitimate case to be made that such a perspective models accusatory,
judgemental and derisive attitudes to all public utterances, events and motives.
And such a judgement, worthy and honourable as a function of the forth estate,
is incompatible with a public good of growing and enhancing human relations in
all social situations, including classrooms, family kitchens, sanctuaries and
retail operations.
Just yesterday, I witnessed an example of behaviour so
disrespectful of a retail worker by a sixties-something female customer in a
local retail store, that, had I been the worker, I would have had to excuse
myself, go out back, report what was going on to my supervisor, take several
deep breaths, in order to return to continue the abuse she was dishing out,
without losing my composure. The relentless, patient and professional behaviour
and attitude of the retail worker deserves a medal of merit and a promotion in
the business.
A bus driver of my acquaintance persistently reports
similar incidents of rider abuse, so painful and persistent that he retired
early after thirty-plus years at the front of the bus.
The sea of evidence of distortion of the facts, the failure to take
responsibility, and the complete and total absence of any sign of remorse,
reflection and apology is just another of the warning flags that can, does and
will continue to exacerbate geopolitical tensions around the globe.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home